Anjali Rathi vs Alisa Kummel Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Who performs better on their second serve? Kummel, with a recent 39.63% second serve point win rate, slightly outperforms Rathi's 38.1%. This subtle edge could influence the match outcome.
• In return games over recent months, Kummel also excels by winning 54.27% of opponents' second serve points compared to Rathi's 53.46%. For first serve returns, Kummel leads slightly with 34.8% against Rathi's 33.27%, suggesting a stronger return game overall.
• How do they perform under pressure? Kummel has a distinct advantage, saving 49.25% of breakpoints, significantly higher than Rathi's 37.88%, indicating more resilience in critical moments.
• Performance in the past year shows Kummel has a marginally superior win rate at 58.33% compared to Rathi's 52%, pointing to better overall form.
• Surface preferences contrast, with Kummel favoring hard courts (60% win rate) and Rathi excelling on clay (64%), which could determine who has the upper hand based on the match surface.
• Player level consideration reveals Kummel has frequently played in lower-tier events, winning 56.67%, while Rathi has competed at a higher level, boasting a 61.54% win rate, suggesting stronger competition experience for Rathi.
• In terms of opponent quality, Rathi has faced higher-ranked players with an average rank of 243.84 compared to Kummel's opponents averaging a rank of 367.63, which might indicate tougher match experiences for Rathi.
• If the match reaches a deciding set, Rathi has a notable advantage, winning 75% of such sets compared to Kummel's 50% win rate, making Rathi more reliable in tightly contested scenarios.
• Rathi converts more break points recently at 39.22% against Kummel's 33.68%, implying Rathi may capitalize better on scoring opportunities.

Editorial Prediction (August 7, 2025, UTC):

As we analyze the recent performance metrics, it is apparent that Kummel holds a slight edge in both serving and return statistics. Kummel's higher breakpoint saving rate indicates a significant ability to perform under pressure. However, Rathi shows resilience with superior performance in deciding sets.

Rathi's exposure to stronger competition, as evidenced by the higher ranking average of opponents, might provide an edge in adapting to challenging scenarios. Additionally, Rathi's better breakpoint conversion rate may prove crucial in pivotal moments of the match.

While Kummel's overall match win rate is higher, Rathi's better experience against tougher opponents and prowess in crucial deciding sets can play a pivotal role. Considering these factors, Rathi is likely to have the upper hand in this matchup.